A Vote for a Maloney-style Amendment is a vote for President Obama’s Radical Transgender Bathroom Guidance

Tomorrow the House of Representatives will most likely vote on an amendment that supports President Obama’s executive order elevating sexual orientation and gender identity into a federal protected class.

In July 2014, President Obama issued E.O. 13672, unilaterally elevating sexual orientation and gender identity to special status for purposes of federal contracts. This means that federal bureaucrats could discriminate against, and strip contracts from, contractors that, for example, do not give biological men unfettered access to employee bathrooms designated for women. Congress has repeatedly voted down ENDA — the so-called Employment Non-Discrimination Act — to avoid forcing just such a radical national bathroom policy on American business.

The Maloney Amendment would constitute Congress’s blessing and ratification of the President’s end-run around Congress. It constitutes bad policy that unnecessarily regulates businesses on sensitive matters. Finally it risks undoing the Russell Amendment which was included in the House-passed NDAA, which takes longstanding protections in civil rights law and makes clear that the president’s orders are not exempt from them.

According to Roger Severino, the Director of the DeVos Institute for Religion and Civil Society, the Maloney-style amendments would:

  • “Ratify and give Congress’s blessing to Obama’s executive overreach, thereby encouraging him to do more of it.Solidify SOGI protection as national policy.

    • This would be cited by judges as a reason to uphold Obama’s overreaching and often lawless executive actions imposing SOGI policies (including bathroom access) on schools, private employers, housing providers, medical professionals, and health insurers.
    • This would be used by judges as further reason to declare SOGI a protected class under the Constitution.
  • Affirm the left’s propaganda that SOGI is equivalent to race and that there is massive unjust discrimination against LGBT persons in America today that requires a federal response.

  • Effectively impose ENDA on federal contractors.

    • This would require contractors to grant biologically male employees who identify as women unfettered access to women’s lockers, showers, and bathrooms. It would also require employees address co-workers by the pronouns of their choice regardless of biological sex. It would also require contractors to provide spousal employee benefits to same-sex spouses to the same extent provided to husband-wife couples.
  • Harm religious liberty.

    • Although Maloney contains some protection for employers to hire according to their “particular religion,” it protects only religious non-profits and the Obama administration or courts can interpret the protection narrowly to deny protection of religiously-motivated employee conduct standards. The Obama administration has explicitly refused to say that such conduct standards are protected for religious non-profits. As a result, courts and the administration may (and likely will) say that contractors like Catholic Charities are free to hire only baptized Catholics, but may not deny employees access to the bathroom of their choice or same-sex spousal benefits.
    • For-profit contractors that exercise religious beliefs while they earn a living, such as Hobby Lobby, would get no protection whatsoever under Maloney.
  • May undo the Russell Amendment.

    • The Russell Amendment protects religious non-profit contractors by applying the ADA’s explicit protection of faith-based employee conduct policies. Depending on the timing of when Russell vs. Maloney become law, Maloney may be interpreted to supersede this vital protection.

Conscience, freedom of speech and association, and religious freedom would suffer as an unavoidable consequence of Maloney (some on the left consider this the goal, not byproduct of Maloney). Although some harms can be mitigated through aggressive subsequent amendments, no amendment will eliminate those harms completely. Some harms, such as ratifying overreach, elevating SOGI to a protected class, and harming the culture cannot be mitigated at all by any amendment short of striking Maloney completely.”

As we saw last week, undermining religious liberty is not a prerequisite to passing appropriations measures in the House. Moving forward, it will be critical that House Republicans defeat any attempt by Democrats to further erode our First Amendment rights by codifying President Obama’s executive order through the appropriations process. House Republicans should expect Democrats to offer similar amendments on every appropriations bill moving forward, and must be prepared to defeat these amendments that threaten the very foundations of our civil society.

Please Share Your Thoughts

16 thoughts on “A Vote for a Maloney-style Amendment is a vote for President Obama’s Radical Transgender Bathroom Guidance

  1. It’s perfect time to make some plans for the future and it is time to be
    happy. I have read this submit and if I may I desire to recommend you few fascinating issues
    or advice. Perhaps you could write subsequent articles referring to
    this article. I want to learn more things about it!

  2. You know, my sister is not transgender but gets mistaken for a male sometimes just because of her build and short hair. I don’t see that this foolishness from the heritage foundation is going to accomplish anything except make her life more difficult. Don’t we have more important things to fix in this country?

  3. Se lhe barato é Sexo Virtual Contato Sexy é lugar perfeito a fim
    de que você, porque 50% dos nossos clientes estão atrás de Sexo Virtual
    todos e cada um dos dias.

  4. I have been exploring for a little for any
    high quality articles or weblog posts in this kind of house .
    Exploring in Yahoo I ultimately stumbled upon this website.
    Reading this info So i’m happy to convey that I’ve an incredibly good uncanny feeling I came upon just what I needed.
    I so much no doubt will make certain to do not omit this website and give it
    a look regularly.

  5. Completely nuts. Word salad. I like the fact that 2 of the 9 comments appear to be generated by bots. There is the 21st century audience for this drivel.

  6. Pingback: Thorner: Shame on Illinois GOP Congressmen for brushing off religious freedom protection | Nancy J. Thorner

  7. Hello just wanted to give you a brief heads up and let you know a few of
    the pictures aren’t loading correctly. I’m not sure why but I think
    its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different internet
    browsers and both show the same results.

  8. Pingback: Rep. Maloney Relents, Asks Democratic Party to Turn Over 'Peeping Tom' Videos of Challenger's Family - Breitbart

  9. We produce gorgeus weeb sites and microsites, design inventive logos
    and corporate identification materials, createe and launch email advertising campaigns, and produce all kinds of printed material!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *