Remove Government Barriers to Quality Healthcare
Doctors know best when it comes to caring for their individual patients. In addition, doctors want to know that the care they give is high quality and, if there are aspects of their care that need improvement, they are ready and willing to improve. Unfortunately, government payment rules, coding mandates, practice guidelines and reporting requirements impose a non-clinical burden on doctors that does nothing to either assess the quality of a physician’s care or help them to improve that care.
The increased burden of non-clinical activities such as reporting on a myriad of often meaningless quality measures make it difficult for doctors to spend meaningful time with patients. When a computer screen gets more attention than a patient during an office visit, the patient-doctor relationship is eroded.
Federal and state regulations also inhibit medical innovation. In order to promote an environment where doctors can provide high value health care for their patients, several things are needed:
One, remove excessive regulations from the day to day practice of medicine. The expanding bureaucratic regulation diverts physicians’ precious time, energy and effort away from patient care to comply with a growing body of government rules, regulations and paperwork. Time spent on administrative or bureaucratic paperwork is time lost to patient care.
Two, remove restrictions on truly innovative ways of delivering health care. For example, Medicare’s payment prohibition on new, physician-owned specialty hospitals. These hospitals often fill a medical void in a community, many focusing on specific medical problems, including cancer and heart disease, and the performance of these hospitals has generally been superior in terms of higher quality of care and better medical outcomes.
Three, remove the mandates to report on meaningless quality measures. The pursuit of better value in health care is a laudable goal. However, given the current gaps in performance measures, a “one-size-fits-all” approach is counterproductive. In order to ensure that measures will lead to better care for the patients they treat, providers should have maximum flexibility in choosing the metrics for assessment.
Background: In an effort to win the support of health insurance companies during the debate over Obamacare in 2009, three health insurer bailout provisions were…Read more
Background: Market consolidation in the American health care system has occurred over the last couple of decades. From 1998 to 2012, there were a total…Read more
Obamacare ‘Insurer Bailouts’ Become Less Likely Under President Trump
By Melissa Quinn, senior news reporter for the Daily Signal Insurance companies hoping for relief in the form of changes to two Obamacare programs may…
Americans face high costs, fewer choices on Obamacare’s Fourth Open Enrollment
By Gloria Taylor Last week marked the start of open enrollment for Obamacare. While the exchange websites may not be crashing and burning this year,…
In Desperate Push to Save Dying Obamacare, President Wants to Bail Out Insurers
By William Wolfe, Heritage Action Deputy Director of Policy Initiatives and Coalitions The death knell for Obamacare has been rung. President Barack Obama’s own Department…
Doctor Sentinel Strategy Call 10/26/16
Yesterday, conservative doctors from across the country joined together for our very first monthly Sentinel Doctor Strategy call. We provided an introduction to the program, an overview…