John Dingell, the longest serving member of Congress in the history of the country, famously said, “If you let me write the procedure, and I let you write the substance, I’ll screw you every time.” This time, the Gang of Eight wrote the substance and is dictating the procedure.
Earlier this week, many saw the following Reuters’ headline: Immigration bill clears early test vote.
What was this so-called test vote?
In Senate parlance is was the Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Proceed to S. 744, which is the Gang of Eight’s amnesty bill. What does that mean in non-Washington language? Reuters described it as “a procedural roadblock that opponents regularly use to delay or even kill legislation.”
Put another way, agreeing to the motion essentially allows debate on the bill to begin (and yes, that aforementioned vote did require 60 votes). But debates are weird in Washington. That is especially true in the U.S. Senate, which used to be known as the world’s greatest deliberative body.
Conservatives, including Sens. Ted Cruz (R-TX), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Mike Lee (R-UT), Jeff Sessions (R-AL) and David Vitter (R-LA), opposed the Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Proceed to S. 744. They understand, as does Heritage Action, that the Gang of Eight’s amnesty bill is flawed beyond repair.





