FamilyHeader

Public Policy Should Not Condemn Americans with Traditional View of Marriage

Marriage policy matters both for the well being of children and the preservation of religious liberty.  At the federal level, legal recognition of same-sex marriage will increase the potential for conflicts with religious freedom.

This is not theoretical.

Think of the baker accused of violating the law in Colorado for declining a request to bake a cake for a same-sex union on the basis of his faith.  An administrative law judge in Denver, Colorado declared Jack Phillips of Masterpiece Cakeshop violated the law by refusing to bake a cake for the same-sex wedding. 

Similarly, “a Christian-owned photography business in New Mexico faced legal proceedings because the owners objected on religious grounds to photographing a same-sex commitment ceremony.”

But the Heritage Foundation explains “not all conflicts with religious freedom will involve actual solemnizing or celebrating of a marriage or even marriage at all.”

Rather, these conflicts can extend to issues involving sex, marriage, and family. Apart from facing legal action, the Heritage Foundation lists several threats to religious freedom involving same-sex issues:

  • Exemptions from taxation and tax deductions for charitable contributions;
  • Adoption or foster care services receiving federal funds;
  • Conditions attached to government contracts, programs, or approvals;
  • Discrimination by public colleges and universities receiving federal funds; and
  • The accreditation process for institutions and programs of higher education.

Federal policy should protect religious freedom and rights of conscience in these areas.

Maintaining federal protections for religious freedom is also closely connected with the well being of children.  The issue of adoption is where this problem is brought into sharp focus.

For example, “in 2006, Catholic Charities leaders in Massachusetts explained Catholic adoption services would not place children with same-sex couples.”  Catholic Charities in Massachusetts has since been forced to stop providing adoption services.  The same has happened in Illinois and Washington, D.C.

The Heritage Foundation points out the absurdity here:

Forcing faith-based charities out of the social service sector because they will not provide services that contradict their faith produces the absurd result of decreasing services through a policy purportedly designed to increase them.

Restricting Catholic Charities in their efforts to place children in adoptive homes harms children.

For this and so many other reasons, it’s critical federal policy does not condemn “those who uphold the ideal of a mother and father for children.”  Americans should not be forced to “compromise their belief  that children deserve the opportunity to grow up in a stable, married household and experience the unique benefits provided by both a mother and a father.”

 

Suggested Tweets
The federal government should not restrict my #religiousfreedom.

Tweet This

I believe marriage is between one man and one women. The federal government can't condemn me for that.

Tweet This

Our #religiousfreedom should not come under attack by the federal government.

Tweet This

Please Share Your Thoughts

2 thoughts on “Public Policy Should Not Condemn Americans with Traditional View of Marriage

  1. So, in order to keep you from “being condemned” by the federal government, you’re ok with condemning everyone else that has a different view? If you want equal rights, if you believe that African Americans and women are entitled to the very same rights as other Americans, then you can’t have it both ways. It’s equal rights for all, or no rights for any. Make up your mind.

    Personally, give homosexual the marriage rights they deserve; I believe in equal rights for all.

  2. Religious groups do not want to tell secular groups how to place children for adoption. They want to retain the right to follow their religious beliefs without the government making them do something against their Biblical beliefs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *