Constitution Trampled: Food Safety Bill Rushed through Senate

House Speaker Pelosi and Senate Leader Reid are trying to ram as much of their far-left agenda through the Congress as possible during the remaining weeks of the lame duck session. They thought they’d achieved a victory yesterday with a food safety bill (the “FDA Food Safety Management Act”). As The Heritage Foundation noted, this was a $1.4 billion boondoggle of over-regulation aimed at a problem the market is already correcting. The food safety bill passed the Senate yesterday, over the objections of the Senate’s conservatives.

Not so fast, says the Constitution. The Senate version of the food safety bill included new fees that raise revenue.

More: analysis of the Constitutional and political implications of the rushed bill.

US Constitution, Article I, Section 7 states:

All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives

The new version of the food safety bill, passed in a rush by the Senate, should have been originated in the House of Representatives. Now, according to Roll Call’s interviews with House and Senate aids, the resulting Constitutional power struggle will probably kill the bill:

By pre-empting the House’s tax-writing authority, Senate Democrats appear to have touched off a power struggle with members of their own party in the House. The Senate passed the bill Tuesday, sending it to the House, but House Democrats are expected to use a procedure known as “blue slipping” to block the bill, according to House and Senate GOP aides.

This situation presents two troubling issues that will plague the lame duck session and Harry Reid’s Senate.

Sound policy is getting lost in the rush to “get things done.” Thus instead of acting on the pending Obama tax hikes or spurring private sector job creation, the Senate spent days of precious floor time on an ill-fated, harmful bill. Political grandstanding de-legitimizes the Senate’s legislative role.

This is the second time that Harry Reid’s Senate has mistakenly originated revenue raising provisions. The previous attempt was related to a tourism bill that Reid deemed essential to Nevada’s economy. Valuing politics over Constitutional process is a reckless path. In the 112th Congress, Members of the House should push for sound policy and process to stop liberal overreach.

Please Share Your Thoughts

2 thoughts on “Constitution Trampled: Food Safety Bill Rushed through Senate

  1. I can’t speak much for technical procedures, or even if they are truely applicable in this case. I, we all should, discover the true facts ourselves NOT relying upon this media or any media. The citizens of the U.S. have been lied to on way too many occasions to the point we should not believe anyone.
    I skimmed through the bill and this is another corporate control of Congress (I mean both House and Senate), the decades old big corporate “coup d’Etat” has flexed their muscles again. A provision of the Bill caps small farms $500K annual and lesser so that they can NEVER grow. Looks like the corporate control of Congress refusing to allow growth in farms to effectively compete with the big corporate farms.
    Big corporations are property of individuals and operates at the direction of individuals. Pretty obvious to me that some Big Corporate farms also have property not mentioned on their stock reports, how many Congresspeople they own.
    Ignore the pundits, the liars, do the research yourself, don’t be lazy. If you fail to find the same conclusion then you just haven’t done your research. Do you really want to be a puppet? Someone pulls your strings so that’s how you act, what you say, what you do? If so, then these United States have a bigger problem than this bill.

  2. I can’t speak much for technical procedures, or even if they are truely applicable in this case. I, we all should, discover the true facts ourselves NOT relying upon this media or any media. The citizens of the U.S. have been lied to on way too many occasions to the point we should not believe anyone.
    I skimmed through the bill and this is another corporate control of Congress (I mean both House and Senate), the decades old big corporate “coup d’Etat” has flexed their muscles again. A provision of the Bill caps small farms $500K annual and lesser so that they can NEVER grow. Looks like the corporate control of Congress refusing to allow growth in farms to effectively compete with the big corporate farms.
    Big corporations are property of individuals and operates at the direction of individuals. Pretty obvious to me that some Big Corporate farms also have property not mentioned on their stock reports, how many Congresspeople they own.
    Ignore the pundits, the liars, do the research yourself, don’t be lazy. If you fail to find the same conclusion then you just haven’t done your research. Do you really want to be a puppet? Someone pulls your strings so that’s how you act, what you say, what you do? If so, then these United States have a bigger problem than this bill.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *